We needed to facilitate getting the participant's builds into the officially designated machine to be used to demonstrate the game during judging. We needed them to submit their builds, let them test it on the machine, and make sure they don't do something horrible like delete the other teams' folders.
Then Charles said he needed to assist some guests from the industry looking at the game jam, and I was left to man the machine (see what I did there?).
Occasionally manhandling the mic to nag them about the deadline, I was checking off which teams have submitted at least one build.
Some cut it close to just 10-20 minutes before the 5pm deadline (I'm not actually sure if it was an exact 48-hour jam).
And there was even one who, get this: she only attended the first day, then left for home, did the jam by herself in her house, then came up like 20 minutes from the deadline asking to get submitted.
As facilitator, Brett was a nice guy and let her submit for presentation, but it was up to the judges if she was eligible for the prizes.
Paul Gadi of IGDA Manila came by the jam venue and went just as fast. Apparently he was on short notice.
Then a guy gave me a scoring sheet and said, "You're going to be a judge. Paul Gadi couldn't make it to the judging so you'll stand in as the IGDA representative."
Haha. Oh wow.
Thankfully, all teams were able to submit before the deadline.
I would have loved to post screenshots of each game made but I don't have them.
And so after presenting the games, and us two mentors presenting our games too, I had to go and judge.
There were immediately three games that stood out to me:
Prologue: Primitive Life
Pretty unusual game. You see a planet in XCOM geoscape style, and your goal is to fling asteroids at the right position and moment to start the seeds of primordial life.
Crystal Boom
A shooter reminiscent of Clean Asia (the Attractor ship) and Gradle Unison, you dash to attack instead of shooting bullets. I'm a big fan of these games. As a cool bonus, your super attack is you can set arbitrary way-points and your ship will dash to all of them instantaneously.
Silhouettes
These guys went for a safe bet and made a side-scroller of the popular running-man subgenre (i.e. Canabalt clone) but it was an interesting take in that you need a light source to see where you're going. You need to collect glowing spheres to charge up your light, so in addition to avoiding obstacles, catching lights is very important.
Playable Web Build: http://dl.dropbox.com/u/80881529/Silhouettes.htm
I am going to share my personal opinions here:
What hampered the other two games was that the judges didn't get how those games were played, and presentation was part of the judging categories. In contrast, Silhouettes was easily understandable.
For future games, my tip is to add in-game tutorials, perhaps in the same way Silhouettes does. Also I did that in my game, TopSide.
To the game jammers, here's a tip: NO ONE WILL WANT TO BOTHER READING THE HELP/CONTROLS SCREEN. You can't expect people to be patient when all they want is to see how the game plays.
If you find people getting stuck and you have to explain verbally how the game plays, you're doing it wrong.
The game should naturally teach the player how to play, as part of the playing experience.
It could be in-game tutorial text like in Silhouettes or TopSide, it could be some character in-game talking to you how the game plays, it could be tutorial levels, like in Valve's Portal.
Play again the videogames that you play on your PC's and consoles. You'll see these things. And they're very important. The player won't get to experience the fun part of your game if they can't understand the controls in the first place.
Here's part 1 and part 2 of this 3 part post.
I am going to share my personal opinions here:
- Prologue: Primitive Life
- Pros:
- Has a good amount of challenge, testing your aim and ability to time your shots.
- Impressive graphics for something done in 2 days.
- A very unique game, I don't know of any game similar to this.
- Cons:
- Not enough variation. Once you master the skill needed, the fun wears off. My suggestion is to add more types of asteroids in addition to the life asteroid and death asteroid. Perhaps an asteroid that makes depressions on the planet, or ones that build mountains. Perhaps ice asteroids that make oceans, fire asteroids that make volcanoes, etc.
- The presenters themselves noted there were some bugs.
- The presenters did a poor job of explaining the game to the judges. Brett had to re-explain how the game works to the other judges so they could understand it. Remember, some of the judges know very little about video games beyond what they have in their smartphones, so that needs to be taken into account.
- Crystal Boom
- Pros:
- Again, a challenging game. Like I said, I'm a big fan of shooters like these.
- Cons:
- I find little relevance to the theme of "Primitive Life". Even the title, Crystal Boom doesn't have anything to do with the theme. I think the enemies were supposed to look like biological viruses, so there's that. Thing is, they cajoled an existing game genre into the theme, not the other way around. In the end though, I don't care as a gamer, cause I like to play these kinds of games.
- Graphics weren't so good. Check Clean Asia and Gradle Unison for ideas.
- Same problem with Prologue, the judges couldn't understand how the game works even with the presentation that was made. I had to go and explain them.
- Silhouettes
- Pros:
- Challenging game. Running-man games are inherently challenging.
- Easy to understand how to play. Only one judge didn't get it, and still, after a little explaining, he immediately got it. That's a given though, since running-man games always have simple controls.
- Very very good amount of polish to the game, they can take the game as-is, and release it on the appstore. And they should.
- Cons:
- Not that it matters to me, but I also find little relevance to the theme here, if at all. They explained it was "primitive" in the sense that you're running in fear of the dark, like primitive instincts kicking in. But the truth is, again, they cajoled an existing game genre (Canabalt clones) into the theme. It feels like cheating to me on that bit, resting on some sure-win mechanics that other people came up with. But again, its ok. The thing is, they added their own little twist to the running man genre so it wouldn't be generic.
What hampered the other two games was that the judges didn't get how those games were played, and presentation was part of the judging categories. In contrast, Silhouettes was easily understandable.
For future games, my tip is to add in-game tutorials, perhaps in the same way Silhouettes does. Also I did that in my game, TopSide.
To the game jammers, here's a tip: NO ONE WILL WANT TO BOTHER READING THE HELP/CONTROLS SCREEN. You can't expect people to be patient when all they want is to see how the game plays.
If you find people getting stuck and you have to explain verbally how the game plays, you're doing it wrong.
The game should naturally teach the player how to play, as part of the playing experience.
It could be in-game tutorial text like in Silhouettes or TopSide, it could be some character in-game talking to you how the game plays, it could be tutorial levels, like in Valve's Portal.
Play again the videogames that you play on your PC's and consoles. You'll see these things. And they're very important. The player won't get to experience the fun part of your game if they can't understand the controls in the first place.
Here's part 1 and part 2 of this 3 part post.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Made me post. 0/10.